|
Follicular Unit Extraction
Follicular unit extraction is a new modification
of standard follicular unit transplantation. The planting of follicular
units into the recipient area is identical in both techniques and,
thus, both offer transplant growth without “plugginess”.

|
|
The difference is found in the method of harvesting the hair
from the donor area. Instead of excising a strip of hair, suturing
the area together, and then dissecting the follicular units underneath
a microscope, the follicular units in follicular unit extraction
are removed from the scalp individually, one by one. Therefore,
there is no wound to be sutured and there is no need for microscopes.
The follicular units are removed by placing a 1 mm punch around
a single follicular unit and cutting a small circle through the
skin around that follicular unit. The follicular unit is then grasped
and gently pulled away from the loose connective tissue surrounding
it underneath the skin. (6)
Once it is removed, no further preparation is necessary. It is ready
for planting. The small hole left behind is left to heal in by itself
which it does over one to two weeks. This process is repeated hundreds
of times until the desired number of follicular units are obtained.
Rather than having a white, linear scar as with standard follicular
unit transplantation, the patient is left with numerous 1 mm round
white scars. Proponents claim the advantage is less noticeable scarring
and no tightness of the scalp (because no tissue has been brought
together and sutured as in standard follicular unit transplantation).
(6)
Although good in theory, follicular unit extraction does have some
major drawbacks. One of the greatest is that not every patient scalp
is amenable to follicular unit extraction. In these patients, the
follicular unit tends to tear while it is being teased out of the
skin. Damaged follicular units will not grow as well, if at all.
Frequently, a test procedure is recommended to check whether the
patient’s follicular units remain intact during extraction.
Another major problem is that is difficult to perform large sessions.
The extractions are slow and tedious. Patients desiring large sessions
may have to return multiple days rather than a single day as during
standard follicular unit transplantation.
The capacity for long term growth is a theoretical concern. During
extractions, the follicular units are gently torn from the underlying
tissues. The deepest component of the connective tissue beneath
the follicles tends to be absent in these grafts. Its absence could
possibly lead to weakening of the follicular unit over time. Since
this is a new technique, hair transplant surgeons cannot be sure
of the long term results. Finally, patients must understand that
they will get scars in the donor area either way. Follicular unit
extraction leads to hundreds or thousands of tiny round scars in
the back of the scalp. Whether that is preferable to a linear scar
is debatable.
It is my opinion that standard follicular unit transplantation will
remain the workhorse of most surgeons’ practices, but that
a minority of patients might benefit from
follicular unit extraction. This would include patients with limited
donor material remaining due to tightness of the scalp, patients
who tend to heal with wide scars after suturing, patients with loss
of eyebrow or mustache hair that require follicular units of a particular
size, or patients in the military who must keep their hair in the
donor area very short. (6)

|